Interpretation of Blocks

Unrealistic expectations are the most common causes of a “perception of failure” after a procedure. Most nerve blocks are done for diagnostic purposes as well as for treatment. We all hope that a single nerve block will be able to take our pain away and allow us to go back to our normal lives. Although this is occasionally true, it is not the rule, but the exception.

 

Most nerve blocks are performed with local anesthetics as well as steroids. If you are to get any long-term benefits, this will occur as a consequence of the steroids. The purpose of steroids is to decrease any chronic swelling that may exist in the area. They normally begin to work immediately after being injected. Nevertheless, in most patients, it will take 5 to 10 days for the swelling to come down to the point where you will be able to tell a difference. Steroids will only help if there is swelling to be treated. If the problem is one of mechanical compression, you will get no benefit from those steroids. As such, the steroids have a diagnostic purpose, where if effective, they suggest an inflammatory component to the pain, and if ineffective, they rule out inflammation as the main cause or component of the problem. This is usually referred to as the “long-term benefit” of the procedure.

 

In the case of local anesthetics, their goal is not only to provide you with some relief of the pain during and after the procedure, but they also have a crucial role in the diagnosis of your condition. There are short-acting (1-2 hours) and long-acting (4-6 hours) local anesthetics. Most will begin to work within15 to 20 minutes after injected. The duration will depend on the type used (short- vs. Long-acting). It is of outmost importance that patients and their family members keep tract of whether there was immediate relief of the pain after the procedure, and for how long. They are essential in providing diagnostic information to the physician. Normally, if the patient does not obtain any relief of the pain for the duration of the local anesthetic, this would suggest that the blocked nerve was not responsible for the conduction of the painful stimulus. On the other hand, good relief of the pain during the time that the numbing medicine is in effect, would be interpreted as a success in having identified the nerve that is transmitting the painful impulse, even if the pain returns when the local anesthetic wears off. This is usually referred to as the “short-term benefit” of the procedure.

 

It is therefore possible to get 100% short-term relief of the pain, with 0% long-term relief. This would suggest that even though the correct structure was blocked, the mechanism of the pain does not involve an inflammatory component and therefore a different technique will need to be applied to obtain longer lasting relief of the pain.

 

The above is only true if all blocks have been performed under radiological guidance, where confirmation of needle placement can be assessed. Otherwise, 0% short-term benefits from the procedure may be as a consequence of a missed target.

 

Sadly, this information is not always given to the patients, and even worse, in the case of diagnostic procedures performed by Non-Pain Specialists, the patients are not followed after the procedure to collect these results. The obvious problem being that a patient may not obtain long-term benefit from the nerve block, and because of this, he/she may wrongly assume that it was a failure. Every nerve block, whether it provides you with relief or not, will always provide a good Pain Physician with invaluable information that can be used to ultimately find the missing piece to the puzzle.